2015-01-05 19:15:32 +01:00
|
|
|
:py:mod:`qubes.tests` -- Writing tests for qubes
|
|
|
|
================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writing tests is very important for ensuring quality of code that is delivered.
|
|
|
|
Given test case may check for variety of conditions, but they generally fall
|
|
|
|
inside those two categories of conformance tests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Unit tests: these test smallest units of code, probably methods of functions,
|
|
|
|
or even combination of arguments for one specific method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Integration tests: these test interworking of units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are interested in both categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is also distinguished category of regression tests (both unit- and
|
|
|
|
integration-level), which are included because they check for specific bugs that
|
|
|
|
were fixed in the past and should not happen in the future. Those should be
|
|
|
|
accompanied with reference to closed ticked that describes the bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qubes' tests are written using :py:mod:`unittest` module from Python Standard
|
|
|
|
Library for both unit test and integration tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test case organisation
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every module (like :py:mod:`qubes.vm.qubesvm`) should have its companion (like
|
|
|
|
``qubes.tests.vm.qubesvm``). Packages ``__init__.py`` files should be
|
|
|
|
accompanied by ``init.py`` inside respective directory under :file:`tests/`.
|
|
|
|
Inside tests module there should be one :py:class:`qubes.tests.QubesTestCase`
|
|
|
|
class for each class in main module plus one class for functions and global
|
|
|
|
variables. :py:class:`qubes.tests.QubesTestCase` classes should be named
|
|
|
|
``TC_xx_ClassName``, where ``xx`` is two-digit number. Test functions should be
|
|
|
|
named ``test_xxx_test_name``, where ``xxx`` is three-digit number. You may
|
|
|
|
introduce some structure of your choice in this number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIXME: where are placed integration tests?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writing tests
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, testing is art, not science. Testing is not panaceum and won't
|
|
|
|
solve all of your problems. Rules given in this guide and elsewhere should be
|
|
|
|
followed, but shouldn't be worshipped.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-01-08 16:48:19 +01:00
|
|
|
Test can be divided into three phases. The first part is setup phase. In this
|
|
|
|
part you should arrange for a test condition to occur. You intentionally put
|
|
|
|
system under test in some specific state. Phase two is executing test condition
|
|
|
|
-- for example you check some variable for equality or expect that some
|
|
|
|
exception is raised. Phase three is responsible for returning a verdict. This is
|
|
|
|
largely done by the framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When writing test, you should think about order of execution. This is the reason
|
|
|
|
of numbers in names of the classes and test methods. Tests should be written
|
|
|
|
bottom-to-top, that is, test setups that are ran later may depend on features
|
2015-01-05 19:15:32 +01:00
|
|
|
that are tested after but not the other way around. This is important, because
|
|
|
|
when encountering failure we expect the reason happen *before*, and not after
|
|
|
|
failure occured. Therefore, when encountering multiple errors, we may instantly
|
|
|
|
focus on fixing the first one and not wondering if any later problems may be
|
2015-01-08 16:48:19 +01:00
|
|
|
relevant or not. Some people also like to enable
|
|
|
|
:py:attr:`unittest.TestResult.failfast` feature, which stops on the first failed
|
|
|
|
test -- with wrong order this messes up their workflow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test should fail for one reason only and test one specific issue. This does not
|
|
|
|
mean that you can use one ``.assert*`` method per ``test_`` function: for
|
|
|
|
example when testing one regular expression you are welcome to test many valid
|
|
|
|
and/or invalid inputs, especcialy when test setup is complicated. However, if
|
|
|
|
you encounter problems during setup phase, you should *skip* the test, and not
|
|
|
|
fail it. This also aids interpretation of results.
|
2015-01-05 19:15:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may, when it makes sense, manipulate private members of classes under tests.
|
|
|
|
This violates one of the founding principles of object-oriented programming, but
|
|
|
|
may be required to write tests in correct order if your class provides public
|
|
|
|
methods with circular dependencies. For example containers may check if added
|
|
|
|
item is already in container, but you can't test ``__contains__`` method without
|
|
|
|
something already inside. Don't forget to test the other method later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Qubes-specific considerations
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Events
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:py:class:`qubes.tests.QubesTestCase` provides convenient methods for checking
|
|
|
|
if event fired or not: :py:meth:`qubes.tests.QubesTestCase.assertEventFired` and
|
|
|
|
:py:meth:`qubes.tests.QubesTestCase.assertEventNotFired`. These require that
|
|
|
|
emitter is subclass of :py:class:`qubes.tests.TestEmitter`. You may instantiate
|
|
|
|
it directly::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import qubes.tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TC_10_SomeClass(qubes.tests.QubesTestCase):
|
|
|
|
def test_000_event(self):
|
|
|
|
emitter = qubes.tests.TestEmitter()
|
|
|
|
emitter.fire_event('did-fire')
|
|
|
|
self.assertEventFired(emitter, 'did-fire')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to snoop specific class (which already is a child of
|
|
|
|
:py:class:`qubes.events.Emitter`, possibly indirect), you can define derivative
|
|
|
|
class which uses :py:class:`qubes.tests.TestEmitter` as mix-in::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import qubes
|
|
|
|
import qubes.tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestHolder(qubes.tests.TestEmitter, qubes.PropertyHolder):
|
2015-01-08 16:48:19 +01:00
|
|
|
pass
|
2015-01-05 19:15:32 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TC_20_PropertyHolder(qubes.tests.QubesTestCase):
|
|
|
|
def test_000_event(self):
|
|
|
|
emitter = TestHolder()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEventNotFired(emitter, 'did-not-fire')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dom0
|
|
|
|
^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qubes is a complex piece of software and depends on number other complex pieces,
|
|
|
|
notably VM hypervisor or some other isolation provider. Not everything may be
|
|
|
|
testable under all conditions. Some tests (mainly unit tests) are expected to
|
|
|
|
run during compilation, but many tests (probably all of the integration tests
|
|
|
|
and more) can run only inside already deployed Qubes installation. There is
|
|
|
|
special decorator, :py:func:`qubes.tests.skipUnlessDom0` which causes test (or
|
|
|
|
even entire class) to be skipped outside dom0. Use it freely::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import qubes.tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TC_30_SomeClass(qubes.tests.QubesTestCase):
|
|
|
|
@qubes.tests.skipUnlessDom0
|
|
|
|
def test_000_inside_dom0(self):
|
|
|
|
# this is skipped outside dom0
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@qubes.tests.skipUnlessDom0
|
|
|
|
class TC_31_SomeOtherClass(qubes.tests.QubesTestCase):
|
|
|
|
# all tests in this class are skipped
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Module contents
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. automodule:: qubes.tests
|
|
|
|
:members:
|
|
|
|
:show-inheritance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. vim: ts=3 sw=3 et tw=80
|