This service currently does more harm (desync libvirt state with
reality) than good. Since we have qubesd, we may come back to
implementing it properly using libvirt events.
When device extension do not return some "persistent" device as
currently attached, still return it, as it will be attached at next
domain startup. User can distinguish such devices by having
frontend_domain=None (or other VM).
Also, return a set from DeviceCollection.assignments().
While at it, adjust implementation to specification: tags don't have
value, only one bit of information (present/not present).
FixesQubesOS/qubes-issues#2686
It doesn't really make sense to keep man pages in separate package.
Previously it was done to avoid some build dependencies (pandoc require
a lot of them), but it isn't a problem anymore.
This all either have been migrated to core3, or is not needed anymore.
There is still qvm-tools directory with a few tools that needs to be
migrated, or installed as is.
This requires creating LVM volume group, so create on based on loop dev
in /tmp.
This is rather rough, but if any of this fails, run the tests anyway -
it will simply skip LVM tests.
Device ident may contain only characters allowed in qrexec argument.
This will allow using it directly in qrexec argument in Attach/Detach
methods.
This also means PCI extension will need to be updated (it uses ':' in
ident).
QubesOS/qubes-issues#853
This is required to get shutdown notification, when it wasn't initiated
by qubesd (for example 'poweroff' command inside of VM).
Libvirt event loop implementation must be registered before making
connection to libvirt, so move it to the beginning of main().
For now, only 'domain-shutdown' event is emited.
User session may not be started at all (for example no qubes packages
installed there), so don't block it in all the cases. Also this would
prevent running 'qubes.WaitForSession' service...
In practice, default value for 'gui' argument is False, so in most cases
user session will be ignored. Which doesn't matter in most cases -
especially for services called by qubesd.
Keep it uniform - QubesVM() object is responsible for handling
vm.dir_path, Storage() is responsible for handling disk volumes (which
may live in that directory
QubesOS/qubes-issues#2256
Allow specific pool implementation to provide asynchronous
implementation. vm.storage.* methods will detect if given implementation
is synchronous or asynchronous and will act accordingly.
Then it's up to pool implementation how asynchronous should be achieved.
Do not force it using threads (`run_in_executor()`). But pool
implementation is free to use threads, if consider it safe in a
particular case.
This commit does not touch any pool implementation - all of them are
still synchronous.
QubesOS/qubes-issues#2256
