2011-08-29 16:46:44 +02:00
|
|
|
## Note that policy parsing stops at the first match,
|
|
|
|
|
## so adding anything below "$anyvm $anyvm action" line will have no effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Please use a single # to start your custom comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$anyvm $dispvm allow
|
2014-05-07 13:50:37 +02:00
|
|
|
$anyvm $anyvm deny
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# WARNING: The qubes.VMShell service is dangerous and there are really few
|
|
|
|
|
# cases when it could be safely used. Allowing one VM to execute qubes.VMShell
|
|
|
|
|
# over the other VM allows the former to TAKE FULL CONTROL over the later. In
|
|
|
|
|
# most cases this is not what we want!
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# Instead we should be using task-specific qrexec services which provide
|
|
|
|
|
# assurance as to what program will be responding to the (untrusted) VM
|
|
|
|
|
# requests.
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# It is, however, safe, in most cases, to allow ultimate control of the
|
|
|
|
|
# creating AppVM over the DisposableVM it creates as part of the qrexec service
|
|
|
|
|
# invocation. That's why by default we have "$anyvm $dispvm allow" rule. Note
|
|
|
|
|
# that it does _not_ allow any AppVM to execute qubes.VMShell service over any
|
|
|
|
|
# DispVM created in the system -- that would obviously be wrong. It only allows
|
|
|
|
|
# qubes.VMShell service access to the AppVM which creates the DispVM as part of
|
|
|
|
|
# this very service invocation.
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# See e.g. this thread for some discussion:
|
|
|
|
|
# https://groups.google.com/d/msg/qubes-users/xnAByaL_bjI/3PjYdiTDW-0J
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
